MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100552

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of hepatology · 2021

Efficacy comparison of optimal treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.

Zhang Yu, Wu Jun-Li, Li Le-Qun

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES

Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A total of 627 HCC patients with PVTT after initial treatment with one of the following at Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University: liver resection (LR, n = 225), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 298) or sorafenib (n = 104) were recruited and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 314) and internal validation cohort (n = 313). Survival analysis were repeated after stratifying patients by Cheng PVTT type.

RESULTS

Resection led to significantly higher OS than the other two treatments among patients with type I or II PVTT. TACE worked significantly better than the other two treatments for patients with type III. All three treatments were associated with similar OS among patients with type IV. These findings were supported by the internal validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the optimal treatment for HCC involving PVTT depends on the type of PVTT. LR may be more appropriate for type I or II PVTT; TACE, for type III Sorafenib may be more appropriate than invasive treatments for patients with type IV PVTT.

Для цитирования: Zhang Yu, Wu Jun-Li, Li Le-Qun. Efficacy comparison of optimal treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.. Annals of hepatology. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2021.100552.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.