DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1409969
The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in autoimmune disease: a bidirectional two sample mendelian randomization study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) plays an important role in autoimmune diseases (AD), yet the relationship between mitochondria and autoimmune disease is controversial. This study employed bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore the causal relationship between mtDNA copy number and 13 ADs (including ankylosing spondylitis [AS], Crohn's disease [CD], juvenile rheumatoid arthritis [JRA], polymyalgia rheumatica [PMR], psoriasis [PSO], rheumatoid arthritis [RA], Sjogren's syndrome [SS], systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE], thyrotoxicosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus [T1DM], ulcerative colitis [UC], and vitiligo).
METHODS
A two-sample MR analysis was performed to assess the causal relationship between mtDNA copy number and AD. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) for mtDNA copy number were obtained from the UK Biobank (UKBB), while those associated with AD were sourced from the FinnGen Biobank. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was the primary analysis method, complemented by three sensitivity analyses (MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode) to validate the results.
RESULTS
IVW MR analysis identified significant associations between mtDNA copy number and CD (OR=2.51, 95% CI 1.56-4.22, P<0.001), JRA (OR=1.87, 95% CI 1.17-7.65, P=0.022), RA (OR=1.71, 95%CI 1.18-2.47, P=0.004), thyrotoxicosis (OR=0.51, 95% CI0.27-0.96, P=0.038), and T1DM (OR=0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.96, P=0.038). Sensitivity analyses indicated no horizontal pleiotropy.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study revealed a potential causal relationship between mtDNA copy number and ADs, indicating that these markers may be relevant in exploring new therapeutic approaches.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.