Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024
Patient-reported treatment satisfaction in essential tremor: levels of satisfaction and predictors of satisfaction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Varghese Anjali, Berry Diane S, Ghanem Ali, Hernandez Nora C, Louis Elan D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although managing symptoms is paramount for both essential tremor (ET) patients and their healthcare providers, studies of treatment satisfaction are surprisingly lacking.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the satisfaction of patients who used a range of treatments and assessed the relation of a wide array of factors to satisfaction.
METHODS: One hundred four ET participants (age = 74.5 ± 10.2 years) completed a battery of self-report items. These included demographic information, measures of tremor and clinical history, psychological state, current ET treatment, and a series of questions about satisfaction with treatment.
RESULTS: Analyses of responses to the four current treatment satisfaction questions revealed that the proportion of participants who were satisfied ranged from 35.0% to 57.3% (i.e., approximately 1/3 to 1/2); conversely, the proportion who were dissatisfied ranged from 9.2% to 37.0%. The remainder were neutral. Higher satisfaction levels were observed in participants who were included in treatment selection and who had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery, p's < 0.05. Lower levels of satisfaction were found in participants with a negative psychological state, higher self-rated tremor severity, head/voice/jaw tremors, and more severe physical side effects; and who used botulinum toxin therapy, p's < 0.05.
CONCLUSION: Between 1/3 and 1/2 of patients were satisfied with their treatment, whereas up to 1/3 were dissatisfied. In this initial exploration of correlates of treatment satisfaction in ET patients, we identified a number of associations between satisfaction and clinical, psychological and treatment variables. Additional research is warranted to further explore the nature of these relations over time.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the satisfaction of patients who used a range of treatments and assessed the relation of a wide array of factors to satisfaction.
METHODS: One hundred four ET participants (age = 74.5 ± 10.2 years) completed a battery of self-report items. These included demographic information, measures of tremor and clinical history, psychological state, current ET treatment, and a series of questions about satisfaction with treatment.
RESULTS: Analyses of responses to the four current treatment satisfaction questions revealed that the proportion of participants who were satisfied ranged from 35.0% to 57.3% (i.e., approximately 1/3 to 1/2); conversely, the proportion who were dissatisfied ranged from 9.2% to 37.0%. The remainder were neutral. Higher satisfaction levels were observed in participants who were included in treatment selection and who had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery, p's < 0.05. Lower levels of satisfaction were found in participants with a negative psychological state, higher self-rated tremor severity, head/voice/jaw tremors, and more severe physical side effects; and who used botulinum toxin therapy, p's < 0.05.
CONCLUSION: Between 1/3 and 1/2 of patients were satisfied with their treatment, whereas up to 1/3 were dissatisfied. In this initial exploration of correlates of treatment satisfaction in ET patients, we identified a number of associations between satisfaction and clinical, psychological and treatment variables. Additional research is warranted to further explore the nature of these relations over time.