MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3340/jkns.2025.0165

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026

The Feasibility, Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.

Gao Zhao, Dang Yuanyuan, Liu Jiayu, Wang Yuxin, Shi Xudong, Bao Xiangyang, Wang Lijuan, Zhang Jianning, Zhao Hulin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) treats hydrocephalus effectively, but manual ventricular catheter placement has a high misplacement rate. This study assesses the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of robot-assisted VPS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 87 patients from 2022 to 2024, with 42 receiving robot-assisted VPS and 45 receiving conventional manual VPS. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors affecting placement accuracy.

RESULTS

The robot-assisted cohort showed smaller bilateral frontal horn diameters and a lower Evans index (p<0.05). It achieved higher placement accuracy, required fewer puncture attempts, and had a lower postoperative complication rate (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time (p>0.05). Logistic regression analysis confirmed robot-assistance as a key factor for accurate catheter placement (odds ratio, 6.52; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted VPS achieves precise placement, reduces puncture attempts and complications, and does not increase time costs, confirming its clinical feasibility, accuracy, and safety.

Для цитирования: Gao Zhao, Dang Yuanyuan, Liu Jiayu, Wang Yuxin, Shi Xudong, Bao Xiangyang, Wang Lijuan, Zhang Jianning, Zhao Hulin. The Feasibility, Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt.. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2026. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2025.0165.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.