MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01208.x

Медицинская библиотека · Oral diseases · 2006

Prevalence and risk factors associated with geographic tongue among US adults.

Shulman J D, Carpenter W M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the prevalence of geographic tongue (GT) among US adults.

DESIGN

Population-based case-control study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence or absence of GT.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

Data from 16 833 adults examined during The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 (NHANES III), a study based on multistage probability sampling were analyzed using SAS-callable SUDAAN 9.0.1.

RESULTS

Geographic tongue point prevalence was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.4, 2.3). Multivariate logistic regression showed significant effects of race-ethnicity, with Whites (AOR = 1.8; 1.3, 2.5) and Blacks (AOR = 1.6; 1.2, 2.1) having greater odds of GT than Mexican-Americans; current corticosteroid therapy (AOR = 3.7; 1.54, 8.6). Cigarette smokers had lower GT prevalence (AOR = 0.4; 0.3, 0.6). Fissured tongue (FT) was strongly associated with GT among non-smokers: AOR = 17.5 (7.8, 39.5). We did not find significant associations with age, gender, oral contraceptive use, diabetes mellitus, allergy or atopy, psychological or dermatological conditions as previous research has suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic tongue was more prevalent among Whites and Blacks compared with Mexican-Americans, positively associated with FT, and inversely associated with cigarette smoking.

Для цитирования: Shulman J D, Carpenter W M. Prevalence and risk factors associated with geographic tongue among US adults.. Oral diseases. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01208.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.