Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
Feasibility of 4D-flow CMR for haemodynamic characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after septal myectomy with and without anterior mitral valve leaflet extension.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
El Mathari Sulayman, van Ooij Pim, Merton Renske, Schrauben Eric, Hopman Luuk, Nederveen Aart, Götte Marco, Kluin Jolanda
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The common surgical treatment in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is septal myectomy. This involves resection of a segment of the myocardial septum and can be performed with and without concomitant anterior mitral valve leaflet extension (AMVLE). While both approaches have satisfying clinical outcomes, there is a lack of data regarding the added value of concomitant AMVLE. In particular, their impact on postoperative haemodynamics remains unexplored. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the feasibility of utilizing four-dimensional-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)) to investigate postoperative haemodynamic differences among both surgical approaches.
METHODS: In this feasibility study, nine subjects underwent 4D-flow CMR evaluation, including three patients who underwent isolated myectomy, three patients with myectomy + AMVLE and three healthy controls. Primary end-points were aortic wall shear stress, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) peak velocity and peak kinetic energy in the LVOT and ascending aorta.
RESULTS: Results showed that patients who underwent myectomy with concomitant AMVLE exhibited (i) lower aortic wall shear stress (-21.2%), (ii) lower LVOT peak velocity (-6.3%), (iii) higher kinetic energy in the LVOT (+10.8%) and (iv) lower kinetic energy in the ascending aorta (-28.8%) compared to patients who underwent isolated myectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing additional AMVLE exhibited a better trend towards the haemodynamic reference values from healthy controls compared to patients undergoing isolated myectomy. Our findings underscore the feasibility of 4D-flow CMR to assess postoperative haemodynamic differences in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing different surgical approaches. This highlights the potential of 4D-flow CMR to compare surgical strategies based on postoperative haemodynamics.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch National Medical Ethics Committee, registration number 2022.0078.
METHODS: In this feasibility study, nine subjects underwent 4D-flow CMR evaluation, including three patients who underwent isolated myectomy, three patients with myectomy + AMVLE and three healthy controls. Primary end-points were aortic wall shear stress, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) peak velocity and peak kinetic energy in the LVOT and ascending aorta.
RESULTS: Results showed that patients who underwent myectomy with concomitant AMVLE exhibited (i) lower aortic wall shear stress (-21.2%), (ii) lower LVOT peak velocity (-6.3%), (iii) higher kinetic energy in the LVOT (+10.8%) and (iv) lower kinetic energy in the ascending aorta (-28.8%) compared to patients who underwent isolated myectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing additional AMVLE exhibited a better trend towards the haemodynamic reference values from healthy controls compared to patients undergoing isolated myectomy. Our findings underscore the feasibility of 4D-flow CMR to assess postoperative haemodynamic differences in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing different surgical approaches. This highlights the potential of 4D-flow CMR to compare surgical strategies based on postoperative haemodynamics.
CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch National Medical Ethics Committee, registration number 2022.0078.