MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1877622

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in surgery · 2026

Hemodynamic resilience and enhanced early recovery with fospropofol versus propofol in high-BMI patients undergoing surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Huang Cuiyuan, Song Yue, Li Jia, Lu Yanping, Lai Guangyi, Wang Zuofeng, Ou Shan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with elevated body mass index (BMI) are particularly susceptible to propofol-induced hypotension during anesthesia induction. Fospropofol, a water-soluble prodrug of propofol, may confer hemodynamic advantages through gradual release kinetics, yet its profile in high-BMI patients remains incompletely characterized.

METHODS

This pre-specified secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial (ChiCTR2500101725) enrolled 120 patients with BMI ≥28 kg/m² scheduled for elective surgery, randomised to fospropofol (FOS, n = 60) or propofol (PRO, n = 60). The primary endpoint of this analysis was hypotension incidence (any MAP <65 mmHg) during the pre-incision phase. Key secondary endpoints included hypotension area under the curve (AUC), MAP variability, emergence time, extubation time, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Hypotension incidence was 30.0% (FOS) vs. 71.7% (PRO) [RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.57-3.63; p < 0.001; NNT 2.4 (i.e., one additional patient needs to be treated with fospropofol rather than propofol to prevent one case of hypotension)]. FOS patients had reduced hypotension burden (median AUC 0.0 vs. 29.5 mmHg·min; p < 0.001), lower MAP variability (8.7 ± 2.2% vs. 19.0 ± 7.4%; Cohen's d = 1.87), and higher MAP nadir (median 69.5 vs. 55.0 mmHg; p < 0.001). Emergence time was shorter with FOS (7.9 ± 2.7 vs. 10.7 ± 3.4 min; d = 0.91), as was extubation time (10.0 ± 2.7 vs. 12.7 ± 3.5 min; d = 0.86). A significant treatment × surgery interaction for extubation time (p = 0.042) indicated amplified benefit in abdominal procedures (Δ = -3.58 min vs. -1.07 min).

CONCLUSIONS

Fospropofol demonstrated superior hemodynamic stability during the pre-incision phase and faster early recovery compared with propofol in high-BMI patients, particularly in abdominal surgical procedures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=253889, identifier ChiCTR2500101725 (registered 29 April 2025).

Для цитирования: Huang Cuiyuan, Song Yue, Li Jia, Lu Yanping, Lai Guangyi, Wang Zuofeng, Ou Shan. Hemodynamic resilience and enhanced early recovery with fospropofol versus propofol in high-BMI patients undergoing surgery: a randomised controlled trial.. Frontiers in surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1877622.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.