MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.301

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical endoscopy · 2013

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome associated with serrated adenoma and malignant polyp: a case report and a literature review of 13 cronkhite-Canada syndrome cases in Korea.

Yun So Hee, Cho Jin Woong, Kim Ji Woong, Kim Joong Keun, Park Moon Sik, Lee Na Eun, Lee Jae Un, Lee Young Jae

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare nonfamilial polyposis syndrome characterized by epithelial disturbances both in the gastrointestinal tract and in the epidermis. The pathologic finding of the polyp is usually a hamartomatous polyp of the juvenile type; however, the possibility of serrated adenoma associated malignant neoplasm was reported in some Japanese cases. Up till now in South Korea, 13 CCS cases have been reported, but there was no case accompanied by the colon cancer. We report the first case of CCS associated with malignant colon polyp and serrated adenoma in Korea. A 72-year-old male patient who complained of diarrhea and weight loss was presented with both hands and feet nail dystrophy, hyperpigmentation, and alopecia. Endoscopic examination showed numerous hamartomatous polyps from the stomach to the colon. The pathologic results confirmed colon cancer and serrated adenoma. Helicobacter pylori eradication and prednisolone was used. Thus, the authors report this case along with a literature review.

Для цитирования: Yun So Hee, Cho Jin Woong, Kim Ji Woong, Kim Joong Keun, Park Moon Sik, Lee Na Eun, Lee Jae Un, Lee Young Jae. Cronkhite-Canada syndrome associated with serrated adenoma and malignant polyp: a case report and a literature review of 13 cronkhite-Canada syndrome cases in Korea.. Clinical endoscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.301.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.