BMC oral health · 2026
Innovative design of a novel combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant for severe atrophic edentulous dentition: a finite element analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tang Yantai, Nie Huimin, Liu Zhonghao, Zhou Wenjuan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a novel combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant to rehabilitate severely atrophic edentulous mandibles. We aimed to elucidate its biomechanical behavior through finite element analysis.
METHODS: Using CBCT data from an edentulous patient, we reconstructed a 3D mandibular model. We designed intraosseous fixtures tailored to the residual bone volume and fused them with superstructure abutments and a customized subperiosteal titanium mesh using 3-matic software. Four finite element models were assembled, varying in implant design and abutment count. These models were subjected to four loading conditions: anterior vertical, unilateral molar vertical, bilateral molar vertical, and unilateral molar lateral occlusions. Biomechanical performance was assessed by evaluating the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the peri-implant bone and the von Mises stresses in the prosthetic components.
RESULTS: Under simulated masticatory loads, the novel combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant exhibited stress levels well within the elastic range of the material, avoiding plastic deformation. Notably, the six-abutment configuration proved superior under posterior loading, reducing peak von Mises stress in screws by roughly 33% and in implants by 25.5% relative to ultra-short implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant exhibits superior biomechanical stability for severe mandibular atrophy scenarios. By significantly mitigating stress concentrations, particularly in the six-abutment setup, this design presents a viable clinical alternative to overcome common prosthetic rehabilitation challenges.
METHODS: Using CBCT data from an edentulous patient, we reconstructed a 3D mandibular model. We designed intraosseous fixtures tailored to the residual bone volume and fused them with superstructure abutments and a customized subperiosteal titanium mesh using 3-matic software. Four finite element models were assembled, varying in implant design and abutment count. These models were subjected to four loading conditions: anterior vertical, unilateral molar vertical, bilateral molar vertical, and unilateral molar lateral occlusions. Biomechanical performance was assessed by evaluating the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the peri-implant bone and the von Mises stresses in the prosthetic components.
RESULTS: Under simulated masticatory loads, the novel combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant exhibited stress levels well within the elastic range of the material, avoiding plastic deformation. Notably, the six-abutment configuration proved superior under posterior loading, reducing peak von Mises stress in screws by roughly 33% and in implants by 25.5% relative to ultra-short implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed combined intraosseous-subperiosteal hybrid implant exhibits superior biomechanical stability for severe mandibular atrophy scenarios. By significantly mitigating stress concentrations, particularly in the six-abutment setup, this design presents a viable clinical alternative to overcome common prosthetic rehabilitation challenges.