MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/vsu.13884

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary surgery : VS · 2022

Preputial urethrostomy with preservation of the local anatomy in 4 dogs.

Giansetto Thomas, Broux Olivier, Bolen Géraldine, Claeys Stéphanie

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel modified preputial urethrostomy with preservation of the local anatomy in 4 dogs.

STUDY

DESIGN

Short case series.

ANIMALS: Four client-owned male dogs.

METHODS

Dogs presented for dysuria and urethral obstruction and underwent a modified preputial urethrostomy as a salvage procedure after the failure of previous treatments. Urethral stenosis or tear was confirmed by cysto-urethrography in all dogs. The preputial urethrostomy involved anastomosis of the pelvic urethra with the preputial mucosa after caudal laparotomy, without dissection of the prepuce or amputation of the penis. Owner follow up was obtained by telephone interview.

RESULTS

Urinary obstruction was due to urethral stenosis in 3 dogs and severe complications following perineal urethrostomy in 1 dog. The urinary obstruction was resolved in all dogs by the modified preputial urethrostomy. None of the dogs had signs of dysuria, urinary tract infection, or dermatitis immediately postoperatively. Two dogs showed signs of urinary incontinence from 15 days to 1 month postoperatively, which persisted throughout the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

A functional urethral stoma was obtained in all dogs. This technique may be an alternative to prepubic urethrostomy in male dogs.

Для цитирования: Giansetto Thomas, Broux Olivier, Bolen Géraldine, Claeys Stéphanie. Preputial urethrostomy with preservation of the local anatomy in 4 dogs.. Veterinary surgery : VS. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13884.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.