DOI 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106867
A suction blister model to characterize epidermal wound healing and evaluate the efficacy of the topical wound healing agent INM-755 in healthy volunteers.
Аннотация
Non-healing wounds represent a substantial medical burden with few effective treatments available. To address this challenge, we developed a novel epidermal wound healing model using suction blisters in healthy volunteers. This model allowed for the comprehensive assessment of wound healing dynamics and the evaluation of INM-755, a topical cream containing cannabinol, as a potential therapeutic agent. Two clinical studies were conducted: an observational study and an interventional study. In both studies, healthy volunteers underwent a suction blister procedure on their lower back, creating open epidermal wounds. Wound healing parameters were assessed using advanced imaging systems. Skin barrier function and perfusion were evaluated through trans epidermal water loss (TEWL) and dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT), respectively. The observational study demonstrated the successful and reproducible induction of blisters and the removal of epidermal sheet, enabling quantifiable measurements of wound healing parameters over time. Re-epithelialization was observed, revealing recovery of skin barrier function and perfusion. In the interventional study, differences of treatments over time were quantified using the above-described techniques. Despite differences from disease-specific blistering, our developed model provides a valuable platform for studying wound healing mechanisms and assessing novel therapeutic interventions. The sensitivity to treatment effects demonstrated in our study underscores the potential utility of this model in early-phase clinical drug development programs targeting wound healing disorders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.