DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.05.006
Image-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Central Renal Cell Carcinoma: Assessment of Clinical Efficacy and Safety in 31 Tumors.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess clinical efficacy and safety of image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of central renal cell carcinoma with adjunctive pyeloperfusion.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Patients with central renal tumors who underwent percutaneous RF ablation between 2005 and 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Thirty patients with 31 central renal tumors underwent 39 RF ablation sessions. Mean tumor diameter was 3.7 cm (range, 2-7 cm). Median distance between tumor and renal pelvis was 5 mm (range, 0-15 mm). Pyeloperfusion was performed in 27 patients (27/30; 90%). Contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging was performed to evaluate treatment response.
RESULTS
Technical success of RF ablation was achieved in 38/39 (97.4%) ablation sessions. Primary efficacy was 83.9% (26/31) on first follow-up imaging. One (3.2%) case of local tumor progression was detected 6 months after initial ablation. Secondary efficacy was 96.8% (30/31) after repeat RF ablation for residual tumor or local tumor progression. Median follow-up was 88 months (mean 82.6 mo ± 30.7; range, 9-121 mo). Major complications occurred in 5/39 (12.8%) RF ablation sessions. Complications were significantly higher for tumors located within 5 mm of the renal pelvis or 0 mm of a major calyx (28.6% vs 4.0%; P < .05). Overall survival was 96.0% (95% CI, 88.4%-100.0%), and progression-free survival at 5 years was 80.9% (95% CI, 65.8%-95.9%).
CONCLUSION
Image-guided percutaneous RF ablation combined with pyeloperfusion has satisfactory clinical efficacy in treating central renal tumors. Although clinically effective, RF ablation of central tumors may also be associated with significant major complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.