DOI 10.1007/s10143-025-04053-4
Risk assessment of brain retraction injury based on quantitative evaluation of brain retraction distance during skull-base meningioma surgery.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
In skull-base surgery, excessive brain retraction may cause brain retraction injury (BRI), yet the brain retraction distance (BRD) that contributes to BRI and the potential of skull-base approaches to reduce BRD remain unclear. This study used a virtual reality (VR)-based method to quantify BRD related to BRI and to assess the impact of skull-base approaches on reducing BRD.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients who underwent frontotemporal craniotomy for anterior skull-base tumors. Three-dimensional models were generated from perioperative imaging, and the frontal lobe was virtually elevated on the 3D model to reproduce the surgical exposure. BRD was estimated by comparing pre- and post-retraction configurations, and its association with BRI was assessed. Additionally, a virtual orbitotomy was performed to evaluate how much BRD could be reduced with this approach.
RESULTS
Four patients developed BRI. The median BRD was 6.2 mm in the non-BRI group, whereas it was 12.2 mm in the BRI group, demonstrating a significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 10.1 mm as the optimal cutoff value for predicting BRI, yielding a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92.9%. The median BRD decreased from 8.3 mm to 5.8 mm after adding an orbitotomy on the 3D model, with the greatest reduction observed in cases requiring larger BRD.
CONCLUSION
VR-based preoperative measurement of BRD may help assess both the risk of BRI and the potential benefit of skull-base approaches. This technique could support selecting an optimal surgical strategy by considering the anticipated BRD for each patient.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.