MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013702

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024

Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Functional Stenosis Assessment: FUSION-A Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Jeremias Allen, Maehara Akiko, Matsumura Mitsuaki, Shlofmitz Richard A, Maksoud Aziz, Akasaka Takashi, Bezerra Hiram G, Fearon William F, Samady Habib, Samuels Bruce, Rapkin Joshua, Gopinath Ajay, Teraphongphom Nutte Tarn, Buccola Jana, Ali Ziad A

Наблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intravascular imaging and intracoronary physiology may both be used to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention; however, they are rarely used together. The virtual flow reserve (VFR) is an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based model of fractional flow reserve (FFR) facilitating the assessment of the physiological significance of coronary lesions. We aimed to validate the VFR assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenoses.

METHODS

FUSION (Validation of OCT-Based Functional Diagnosis of Coronary Stenosis) was a multicenter, prospective, observational study comparing OCT-derived VFR to invasive FFR. VFR was mathematically derived from a lumped parameter flow model based on 3-dimensional lumen morphology. Patients undergoing coronary angiography with intermediate angiographic stenosis (40%-90%) requiring physiological assessment were enrolled. Investigational sites were blinded to the VFR analysis, and all OCT and FFR data were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. The coprimary end points were the sensitivity and specificity of VFR against FFR as the reference standard, each of which was tested against prespecified performance goals.

RESULTS

After core laboratory review, 266 vessels in 224 patients from 25 US centers were included in the analysis. The mean angiographic diameter stenosis was 65.5%±14.9%, and the mean FFR was 0.83±0.11. Overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of VFR versus FFR using a binary cutoff point of 0.80 were 82.0%, 80.4%, and 82.9%, respectively. The 97.5% lower confidence bound met the prespecified performance goal for sensitivity (71.6% versus 70%; P=0.01) and specificity (76.6% versus 75%; P=0.01). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT-derived VFR demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for predicting invasive FFR. Integrating high-resolution intravascular imaging with imaging-derived physiology may provide synergistic benefits as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04356027.

Для цитирования: Jeremias Allen, Maehara Akiko, Matsumura Mitsuaki, Shlofmitz Richard A, Maksoud Aziz, Akasaka Takashi, Bezerra Hiram G, Fearon William F, Samady Habib, Samuels Bruce, Rapkin Joshua, Gopinath Ajay, Teraphongphom Nutte Tarn, Buccola Jana, Ali Ziad A. Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Functional Stenosis Assessment: FUSION-A Prospective Multicenter Trial.. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2024. DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013702.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.