MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/iju5.12706

Медицинская библиотека · IJU case reports · 2024

A case of successful treatment of Fournier's gangrene through conservative management and elective debridement.

Takahashi Toshifumi, Maruno Kouhei, Hazama Tatsuya, Yamada Yuya, Nakashima Masakazu, Kikkawa Kazuro, Tamaki Masahiro, Ito Noriyuki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Fournier's gangrene refers to a necrotizing fasciitis that mainly affects the perineal region and a condition that requires immediate debridement. This case involved elective debridement of Fournier's gangrene after the general condition was improved through antibiotic treatment instead of requesting an emergency debridement.

CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was an 85-year-old man with a performance status of 4 admitted to a nursing home. He was transferred by ambulance with a fever. Blood tests showed a markedly elevated inflammatory response, and computed tomography revealed widespread aerodermectasia around the right testis to the lower abdomen. The patient was diagnosed with Fournier's gangrene. However, his family declined emergency surgical debridement. The patient's general condition was improved with antibiotics, and debridement was eventually performed. After 52 days of hospitalization, the patient was transferred to another hospital.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the successful treatment of Fournier's gangrene through conservative treatment followed by elective debridement.

Для цитирования: Takahashi Toshifumi, Maruno Kouhei, Hazama Tatsuya, Yamada Yuya, Nakashima Masakazu, Kikkawa Kazuro, Tamaki Masahiro, Ito Noriyuki. A case of successful treatment of Fournier's gangrene through conservative management and elective debridement.. IJU case reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12706.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.