Early clinical experience of using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Here, we presented our early experience with flow diversion procedures using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter (SE, Stryker) and reported the feasibility and safety profile compared to those of a control group treated with other types of flow diverters.

METHODS

We included 31 and 53 consecutive flow diversion procedures performed using the SE and other commercial flow diverters, respectively, to treat intracranial aneurysms at our institution. We used two commercial flow diversion systems in the comparison group: the pipeline embolization device and Surpass Streamline.

RESULTS

In the SE group, technical failures occurred in three (9.7%) cases, due to either incomplete wall apposition (n = 1, 3.2%) or stent migration (n = 2, 6.5%). Major complications occurred in four (12.9%) cases: delayed rupture of the target aneurysm (n = 1, 3.2%), major ischemic stroke (n = 1, 3.2%), sudden death from an unidentified cause (n = 1, 3.2%), and parent artery occlusion with stent thrombosis (n = 1, 3.2%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in eight (25.8%) cases. On post-procedure MRI, a DWI-positive lesion was detected in three (9.7%) cases. After multivariate adjustment, the SE group was independently associated with less procedural time of ≥ 90 min (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.03-0.29; p < 0.001), balloon angioplasty (adjusted OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.75; p = 0.015), and DWI-positive lesions (adjusted OR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.19; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The SE is safe and easy to deploy.