American journal of clinical pathology · 2023
Warm autoantibodies mimicking alloantibodies: Three cases of autoantibodies with unusual antigenic specificity.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jacobs Jeremy W, Binns Thomas C, Abels Elizabeth, Silva Campos Juan J, Elkabbani Ragaa, Kress Anna, Sostin Nataliya, Tormey Christopher A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We describe 3 cases of red blood cell (RBC) autoantibodies with unusual apparent antigenic specificity and discuss the testing methodology and implications of these findings.
METHODS: All immunohematologic testing, including ABO and RhD typing, antibody detection and identification, RBC antigen phenotyping and genotyping, direct antiglobulin tests, and elution studies were performed using standardized and validated methods and reagents.
RESULTS: Three patients were found to have autoantibodies, which were originally presumed to be alloantibodies. Case 1 was a 60-year-old man with autoanti-Jka following babesiosis; case 2 was a 79-year-old woman with an autoanti-f; and case 3 was a 28-year-old pregnant woman with an autoanti-S. Cases 1 and 2 required RBC transfusions, which were performed with Jka-negative and f-positive RBC units, respectively. No transfusion reactions were reported, and the hemoglobin responded appropriately in both cases.
CONCLUSIONS: These 3 cases complement the minimal literature regarding warm autoantibodies with unusual antigenic specificity and their potential to mediate clinically significant hemolysis. There are only rare reports of warm autoantibodies with specificity for non-Rh antigens, and prior authors have suggested that autoantibodies with mimicking specificity are usually detected only serologically; in contrast, 2 of the 3 patients herein experienced autoimmune hemolytic anemia.
METHODS: All immunohematologic testing, including ABO and RhD typing, antibody detection and identification, RBC antigen phenotyping and genotyping, direct antiglobulin tests, and elution studies were performed using standardized and validated methods and reagents.
RESULTS: Three patients were found to have autoantibodies, which were originally presumed to be alloantibodies. Case 1 was a 60-year-old man with autoanti-Jka following babesiosis; case 2 was a 79-year-old woman with an autoanti-f; and case 3 was a 28-year-old pregnant woman with an autoanti-S. Cases 1 and 2 required RBC transfusions, which were performed with Jka-negative and f-positive RBC units, respectively. No transfusion reactions were reported, and the hemoglobin responded appropriately in both cases.
CONCLUSIONS: These 3 cases complement the minimal literature regarding warm autoantibodies with unusual antigenic specificity and their potential to mediate clinically significant hemolysis. There are only rare reports of warm autoantibodies with specificity for non-Rh antigens, and prior authors have suggested that autoantibodies with mimicking specificity are usually detected only serologically; in contrast, 2 of the 3 patients herein experienced autoimmune hemolytic anemia.