MedElevator
Войти в исследования Clinical oral investigations · 2026
Diagnostic accuracy of QrayPen fluorescence scoring for secondary caries in repair-/replacement-indicated posterior composite restorations.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bittar Ahmad, Alkan Elif, Tağtekin Dilek
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the adjunctive diagnostic performance of QrayPen C fluorescence-image severity scoring (QS) for identifying same-site secondary caries in posterior composite restorations already selected for repair or replacement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-centre prospectively conducted observational diagnostic-accuracy study, 102 patients were assessed; 14 declined participation and 5 were excluded because of non-interpretable QLF/clinical images. The final analysis included 83 adults and 120 repair-/replacement-indicated posterior composite restorations. Restorations were assessed using Nyvad criteria, bitewing ICCMS scoring, and QrayPen C imaging. QS was scored on a 0-3 scale and analysed at thresholds > 0, >1, and > 2. The reference standard was same-site dentin status after removal.
RESULTS: Secondary caries was confirmed in 80/120 restorations (66.7%). For QS > 0, sensitivity was 85.0%, specificity 90.0%, accuracy 86.7%, LR + 8.50, and LR- 0.17. Patient-level clustered bootstrap analysis gave similar but wider estimates: sensitivity 85.0% (clustered 95% CI 75.9-92.8) and specificity 90.0% (clustered 95% CI 80.0-97.7). Higher QS thresholds increased specificity but reduced sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: In repair-/replacement-indicated restorations, QS > 0 may help localize suspicious areas and increase diagnostic confidence for same-site secondary caries, but the estimates apply to an enriched clinically problematic cohort.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: QrayPen QS should be interpreted as an adjunctive imaging-derived signal. QS positivity should not justify replacement in isolation, and QS = 0 should not be interpreted as evidence of sound dentin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-centre prospectively conducted observational diagnostic-accuracy study, 102 patients were assessed; 14 declined participation and 5 were excluded because of non-interpretable QLF/clinical images. The final analysis included 83 adults and 120 repair-/replacement-indicated posterior composite restorations. Restorations were assessed using Nyvad criteria, bitewing ICCMS scoring, and QrayPen C imaging. QS was scored on a 0-3 scale and analysed at thresholds > 0, >1, and > 2. The reference standard was same-site dentin status after removal.
RESULTS: Secondary caries was confirmed in 80/120 restorations (66.7%). For QS > 0, sensitivity was 85.0%, specificity 90.0%, accuracy 86.7%, LR + 8.50, and LR- 0.17. Patient-level clustered bootstrap analysis gave similar but wider estimates: sensitivity 85.0% (clustered 95% CI 75.9-92.8) and specificity 90.0% (clustered 95% CI 80.0-97.7). Higher QS thresholds increased specificity but reduced sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: In repair-/replacement-indicated restorations, QS > 0 may help localize suspicious areas and increase diagnostic confidence for same-site secondary caries, but the estimates apply to an enriched clinically problematic cohort.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: QrayPen QS should be interpreted as an adjunctive imaging-derived signal. QS positivity should not justify replacement in isolation, and QS = 0 should not be interpreted as evidence of sound dentin.