MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12887-016-0604-z

Медицинская библиотека · BMC pediatrics · 2016

Imperforate anus with rectopenile fistula: a case report and systematic review of the literature.

Yang Gang, Wang Yingli, Jiang Xiaoping

Клинический случайСтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although anorectal malformations (ARMs) are frequently encountered, rare variants difficult to classify have been reported.

METHODS

This study describes a patient with ARM and rectopenile fistula. The literature was reviewed systematically to assess the anatomical characteristics, clinical presentations and operations of this rare type of ARM.

RESULTS

Eight patients were reported in the six included articles. In three patients, the fistula extended from the rectum to the anterior urethra without communication with the skin. In one patient, the fistula, located deep in corpus spongiosum, opened to the ventral aspect of the penis without communication with the urethra. In the remaining four patients, the fistula extended from the rectum to the cutaneous orifice in the ventral aspect of penis, with communication or a short common channel with the urethra.

CONCLUSIONS

Imperforate anus with fistula extending into the penis is a rare variant of anorectal malformation. Unawareness of this lesion resulted in a delay of correct diagnosis and appropriate management. A thorough examination, including colonourethrography and fistulography, should be performed in all patients with a fistula opening in the ventral aspect of the penis.

Для цитирования: Yang Gang, Wang Yingli, Jiang Xiaoping. Imperforate anus with rectopenile fistula: a case report and systematic review of the literature.. BMC pediatrics. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-016-0604-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.