Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
Upstream stimulating factor 1 (USF1) -202 G/A polymorphism and serum levels of USF1 and USF2 are associated with gastric cancer risk: a case control study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bounder Ghizlane, Jouimyi Mohamed Reda, Essaidi Imane, Elyounsi Ilhame, Boura Hasna, Michel Valérie, Badre Wafa, Touati Eliette, Maachi Fatima
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Gastric cancer is an inflammation-driven disease often associated with a bad prognosis. Upstream stimulatory factors USF1 and USF2 are pleiotropic transcription factors, with tumor suppressor function. Low expression of USF1 is associated with low survival in gastric cancer patients. USF1 genetic polymorphism -202G > A has been associated with cancer susceptibility. Our aim was to investigate USF1 gene polymorphism and serum level with the risk of gastric cancer.
METHODS: USF1-202 G/A polymorphism was analyzed by sanger sequencing, with the measure of USF1/USF2 serum levels by ELISA in H. pylori-positive patients with chronic gastritis, gastric precancerous lesions, gastric cancer and in healthy controls.
RESULTS: Our results show that the presence of the USF1-202 A allele increased the risk of gastric cancer compared to G (OR = 2; 95% CI 1.07-3.9; P = 0.02). Genotypically and under the dominant mutation model, the combined USF1- GA/AA -202 genotypes corresponded to higher risk of gastric cancer (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.2; p-value = 0.005) than the GG genotype. Moreover, the G/A transition at USF1-202 was associated with lower USF1 serum level, and mostly observed in gastric cancer patients where the average serological level of USF1 were 2.3 and twofold lower for the AA and GA genotypes, respectively, compared to GG.
CONCLUSION: USF1-202 G/A polymorphism constitutes a gastric cancer genetic risk factor. Together with USF1/USF2 serum level, they can be proposed as promising biomarkers for gastric cancer detection/prevention.
METHODS: USF1-202 G/A polymorphism was analyzed by sanger sequencing, with the measure of USF1/USF2 serum levels by ELISA in H. pylori-positive patients with chronic gastritis, gastric precancerous lesions, gastric cancer and in healthy controls.
RESULTS: Our results show that the presence of the USF1-202 A allele increased the risk of gastric cancer compared to G (OR = 2; 95% CI 1.07-3.9; P = 0.02). Genotypically and under the dominant mutation model, the combined USF1- GA/AA -202 genotypes corresponded to higher risk of gastric cancer (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.4-8.2; p-value = 0.005) than the GG genotype. Moreover, the G/A transition at USF1-202 was associated with lower USF1 serum level, and mostly observed in gastric cancer patients where the average serological level of USF1 were 2.3 and twofold lower for the AA and GA genotypes, respectively, compared to GG.
CONCLUSION: USF1-202 G/A polymorphism constitutes a gastric cancer genetic risk factor. Together with USF1/USF2 serum level, they can be proposed as promising biomarkers for gastric cancer detection/prevention.