MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.015

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2011

Pial arteriovenous fistula resulting from ventriculostomy.

Schuette Albert J, Blackburn Spiros L, Barrow Daniel L, Cawley Charles M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Ventriculostomy complications are well documented in the literature. We report the first known example of an arteriovenous fistula created during passage of a ventriculostomy catheter for the treatment of hydrocephalus.

METHODS

A 47-year-old female patient initially presented with a subarachnoid hemorrhage and an anterior communicating artery aneurysm. The patient underwent coil embolization followed by a ventriculostomy catheter for hydrocephalus. After recovery, a follow-up angiogram demonstrated a new arteriovenous fistula at the site of the ventriculostomy. A craniotomy was performed at the site of the ventriculostomy burr-hole site. Indocyanine green videoangiography confirmed the site of the fistula.

RESULTS

The fistulous point was coagulated and divided and confirmed with both indocyanine green videoangiography and intraoperative diagnostic angiography. The patient recovered without deficit.

CONCLUSION

This is the first reported case of a pial arteriovenous fistula from a ventriculostomy catheter. The formation of a fistula can occur from trauma to cortical arteries and veins at the pial entry site. Although rare, vascular injury and subsequent fistula formation may form in patients in whom catheter tract hemorrhages occur after catheter placement.

Для цитирования: Schuette Albert J, Blackburn Spiros L, Barrow Daniel L, Cawley Charles M. Pial arteriovenous fistula resulting from ventriculostomy.. World neurosurgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.09.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.