MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/codi.12123

Медицинская библиотека · Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2013

A systematic review of stercoral perforation.

Chakravartty S, Chang A, Nunoo-Mensah J

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: Stercoral perforation is a rarely suspected life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis is difficult but essential. A comprehensive systematic review was performed to evaluate its presentation, diagnosis and treatment.

METHOD: A systematic review was carried out of Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases for all articles published between 1998 and 2011. Only studies describing stercoral perforation were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-four relevant articles were found including 137 patients (median age = 62 years) with stercoral perforation, of whom 81% had chronic constipation. Stercoral perforation was diagnosed by CT scan in 90% of 31 patients, with the commonest findings being a combination of faecal impaction (84%) and subphrenic (90%) or extraluminal air (61%). The commonest site of perforation was the sigmoid colon (50%) followed by the rectosigmoid junction (24%). The overall mortality was 34%.

CONCLUSION

Stercoral perforation should be suspected in elderly and chronically constipated patients with unexplained abdominal pain and investigated appropriately with a CT scan to allow timely and optimal treatment.

Для цитирования: Chakravartty S, Chang A, Nunoo-Mensah J. A systematic review of stercoral perforation.. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12123.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.