MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jicd.12448

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry · 2019

Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Ta Patrick Chieu Poa, Dinh Hue Quyen, Nguyen Kim, Lin Samuel, Ong Yong Li, Ariyawardana Anura

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) in the treatment of pain of  idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TN). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO Industries), Emcare (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), Medline (PubMed), Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). The inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials of GBP as a monotherapy in the treatment of idiopathic TN in adult participants and publications in English. All other study methodologies were excluded. The search yielded 1472 articles, and after exclusion, 11 full-text articles were eligible for full-text analysis. Only two studies met the inclusion criteria. There is insufficient evidence either to support or refute the efficacy of GBP in the management of idiopathic TN. Therefore, further well-designed placebo-controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy of GBP in managing TN pain as a single therapy.

Для цитирования: Ta Patrick Chieu Poa, Dinh Hue Quyen, Nguyen Kim, Lin Samuel, Ong Yong Li, Ariyawardana Anura. Efficacy of gabapentin in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12448.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.