DOI 10.1007/s00701-019-03981-7
Arachnoiditis as an outcome factor for microvascular decompression in classical trigeminal neuralgia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Neurovascular conflict is considered a key element of classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and consequently, microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective treatment. Nevertheless, failures of MVD are described by many authors. In some patients, the arachnoid membranes surrounding the trigeminal nerve and neighbouring vessels may be thickened and adhesive. Here we analyse the impact of such focal arachnoiditis on outcome after MVD for TN.
METHODS
A cohort of prospectively followed patients after their MVD was reviewed for intraoperative, imaging and clinical data if findings of arachnoiditis during MVD were described. Long-term outcome assessment was the main endpoint.
RESULTS
We reviewed data from 395 MVD procedures, performed for TN from 2001 to 2014. Intraoperative evidence of focal arachnoiditis, as described by the surgeon, has been noted in 51 patients (13%). In 35 (68.6%), neuralgia was typical and in the other 17 (31.4%) it was atypical. As expected by definition, neurovascular conflict was found in 49 interventions (96%); it was predominantly arterial in 27 (52.9%). Accompanying arachnoiditis was encountered: mild in 20 interventions (39.2%), severe in 31 (60.8%). A successful result (BNI I or II) was achieved in 29 patients (56.9%). The other 22 patients (43.1%) had persistence or recurrence of pain. Overall KM probability of being pain free at 15 years was 72%.
CONCLUSIONS
Intraoperative finding of arachnoiditis during MVD for classical trigeminal neuralgia is associated with poorer outcome than that of classical trigeminal neuralgia in general. This is particularly true for low grades of conflict.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.