MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-11712-9

Медицинская библиотека · Scientific reports · 2022

Cutting seton versus decompression and drainage seton in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: a randomized controlled trial.

Yu Qiuxiang, Zhi Congcong, Jia Lansi, Li Hui

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study aimed to compare the efficacy between decompression and drainage seton (DADS) and cutting seton (CS) in the treatment of high complex anal fistula. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DADS or CS group. The primary outcome was the rate of wound healing. Second outcomes included time taken to return to work, postoperative pain, the severity of fecal incontinence and other complications. A total of 120 patients with a mean age of 39 years were included. There was no significant difference in the rate of complete wound healing at 1 year. The mean time taken to return to work was 5 ± 2 days in DADS group, shorter than CS group (10 ± 3, p < 0.001). Mean vaizey incontinence score and the post-operation pain in DADS group was significantly lower than CS group. No significant difference was found between two groups in the incidence of complications. DADS is as effective as Cutting seton for the treatment of high complex anal fistula but is associated with less postoperative pain and better sphincter function preserving.

Для цитирования: Yu Qiuxiang, Zhi Congcong, Jia Lansi, Li Hui. Cutting seton versus decompression and drainage seton in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: a randomized controlled trial.. Scientific reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11712-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.