MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000039979

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2024

Bilateral carotid and vertebral rete mirabile with aneurysm misdiagnosed as Moyamoya disease: A case report.

Chen Xiuen, Xiao Chao, Qin Chao

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Rete mirabile (RM) is rare in humans, normally existing in lower mammalian arteries. To study its clinical and imaging features, we report an extremely rare case that occurred in humans and review the literature.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 43-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital because of recurrent dizziness and headache for 4 years.

DIAGNOSES: The computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck indicated that the normal structure of the bilateral cervical and vertebral arteries disappeared, and the microvascular network formed, misdiagnosed as Moyamoya disease.

INTERVENTIONS: She underwent cerebral digital subtraction angiography examination and was finally diagnosed as carotid and vertebral RM with aneurysm.

OUTCOMES: Following the administration of symptomatic treatment, all of her symptoms dissipated, and she was successfully discharged from the hospital.

LESSONS: RM involving in both anterior and posterior circulation is an extremely rare clinical abnormality of cerebrovascular morphology. The radiologists and clinicians should deepen their awareness of the specific CTA feature of RM. When individual CTA examination is insufficient, the utility of digital subtraction angiography is crucial for making a clear diagnosis.

Для цитирования: Chen Xiuen, Xiao Chao, Qin Chao. Bilateral carotid and vertebral rete mirabile with aneurysm misdiagnosed as Moyamoya disease: A case report.. Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000039979.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.