m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026

Morphologic diversity of the epididymis in orchiectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Bayrak Busra Yaprak, Coban Ganime, Oktay Murat, Khurami Fatma Aksoy, Baycelebi Deniz, Aktemur Rabia, Yılmaz Melike Karakuş, Satıcı Fadime Eda Gokalp, Kiran Merve Meryem, Koy Yazgi, Kösemehmetoğlu Kemal, Lozano Juan Sigala, Noyan Asli, Savli Taha Cumhan, Yeldir Neşe, Karabulut Yasemin Yuyucu, Ozbek Busra, Trabzonlu Levent, Akgul Mahmut

Аннотация

The epididymis frequently exhibits a broad spectrum of non-neoplastic epithelial and stromal alterations that may mimic neoplastic or obstructive processes in orchiectomy specimens. Existing data are mostly derived from single-institution series. This multi-institutional study aimed to provide a comprehensive, contemporary, multi-institutional analysis of the prevalence, spectrum, and clinicopathological associations of epididymal morphological variations in a large orchiectomy cohort. This retrospective study included 1,528 orchiectomy specimens from multiple academic centers. All hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides containing epididymal tissue were systematically reviewed using a standardized protocol. Morphological features assessed included atrophy, intranuclear inclusions, lipofuscin pigment, cribriform hyperplasia, Paneth cell-like metaplasia, nuclear atypia, clear cell change, smooth-muscle proliferation, vascular and duct ectasia, myxoid change, calcification, hematoma, and inflammation. Associations with underlying testicular pathologies were analyzed statistically. 66% (1004/1528) were performed for testicular neoplasms, which were predominantly germ cell tumors derived from germ cell neoplasia in situ (87.5%, 878/1004). The most common epididymal alterations were lipofuscin pigment (49.9%, 762/1528), intranuclear inclusions (40.3%, 616/1528), atrophy (35.4%, 541/1528), and duct ectasia (35.3%, 539/1528). Non-tumoral cases more frequently exhibited atrophy (58.4%, 306/524 vs. 23.4%, 235/1004), duct ectasia (45.2%, 237/524 vs. 30.1%, 302/1004), inflammation (21.9%, 115/524 vs. 2.7%, 27/1004), and hematoma (5.9%, 31/524 vs. 0.2%, 2/1004) (p < 0.0001 for all). Tumoral cases showed higher rates of cribriform hyperplasia (28.5%, 286/1004 vs. 16.4%, 86/524), Paneth cell-like metaplasia (12.4%, 124/1004 vs. 1.9%, 10/524), nuclear atypia (21.9%, 220/1004 vs. 17.2%, 90/524), and clear cell change (21.7%, 218/1004 vs. 14.3%, 75/524) (all p ≤ 0.03). Several features, including atrophy, lipofuscin pigment, cribriform hyperplasia, clear cell change, and calcification, showed significant variation across tumor subtypes. Non-neoplastic epithelial and stromal alterations of the epididymis are common and histologically diverse, often co-occurring and varying by underlying testicular pathology. Awareness of these patterns is essential to avoid misinterpretation, especially in oncologic settings. This study provides the largest contemporary dataset to date, offering a robust histopathological framework for epididymal assessment in routine surgical pathology practice.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты