MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fped.2025.1715759

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025

Case Report: Penile hamartoma with penile torsion in a child: etiology-targeted one-stage surgical correction and literature review.

Yao Zhigang, Zhanghuang Chenghao, Zhou Nian, Li Jinrong, Hao Zipeng, Yan Bing, Zhao Hui

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pediatric penile hamartoma is extremely rare. Preoperative imaging often cannot definitively characterize the lesion, and histopathology remains the diagnostic gold standard. We report a child with penile hamartoma and torsion, discuss management, and compare outcomes with the literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical presentation, imaging, intraoperative findings, and pathology. Relevant reports were reviewed for comparison.

RESULTS

Complete excision of a ventral hamartomatous appendage plus circumcision and release of a fibrous tethering band achieved immediate torsion correction in a single stage. Histopathology showed stratified squamous epithelium with proliferative fibrous and adipose tissue containing nerve bundles, ganglion cells, and focal smooth muscle-consistent with hamartoma. Recovery was uneventful; at 12 months no recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSION

Etiology-targeted, one-stage correction-degloving (circumcision), release of tethering bands, complete lesion excision, and simultaneous torsion repair-can be safe and effective. Long-term follow-up is advised.

Для цитирования: Yao Zhigang, Zhanghuang Chenghao, Zhou Nian, Li Jinrong, Hao Zipeng, Yan Bing, Zhao Hui. Case Report: Penile hamartoma with penile torsion in a child: etiology-targeted one-stage surgical correction and literature review.. Frontiers in pediatrics. 2025. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2025.1715759.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.