MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3201/eid2212.160560

Медицинская библиотека · Emerging infectious diseases · 2016

Investigation of and Response to 2 Plague Cases, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2015.

Danforth Mary, Novak Mark, Petersen Jeannine, Mead Paul, Kingry Luke, Weinburke Matthew, Buttke Danielle, Hacker Gregory, Tucker James, Niemela Michael, Jackson Bryan, Padgett Kerry, Liebman Kelly, Vugia Duc, Kramer Vicki

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In August 2015, plague was diagnosed for 2 persons who had visited Yosemite National Park in California, USA. One case was septicemic and the other bubonic. Subsequent environmental investigation identified probable locations of exposure for each patient and evidence of epizootic plague in other areas of the park. Transmission of Yersinia pestis was detected by testing rodent serum, fleas, and rodent carcasses. The environmental investigation and whole-genome multilocus sequence typing of Y. pestis isolates from the patients and environmental samples indicated that the patients had been exposed in different locations and that at least 2 distinct strains of Y. pestis were circulating among vector-host populations in the area. Public education efforts and insecticide applications in select areas to control rodent fleas probably reduced the risk for plague transmission to park visitors and staff.

Для цитирования: Danforth Mary, Novak Mark, Petersen Jeannine, Mead Paul, Kingry Luke, Weinburke Matthew, Buttke Danielle, Hacker Gregory, Tucker James, Niemela Michael, Jackson Bryan, Padgett Kerry, Liebman Kelly, Vugia Duc, Kramer Vicki. Investigation of and Response to 2 Plague Cases, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2015.. Emerging infectious diseases. 2016. DOI: 10.3201/eid2212.160560.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.