MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000013034

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2026

Reconstruction Method After Condylar Osteochondroma Resection: A 10-Year Experience.

Chen Shuo, Zou Hengyu, Jie Bimeng, He Yang

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

There are various methods to reconstruct the defects left after resection of condylar osteochondroma. To explore the efficacy of different reconstruction algorithms for condylar osteochondroma, we retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who underwent surgical resection of osteochondroma. Main symptoms were facial asymmetry (43.0%), malocclusion (26.4%), limited mouth opening (15.3%), and pain (15.3%). On the basis of CT-evaluated tumor extent, 3 reconstruction methods were adopted: arthroplasty (43 cases, 2 with contralateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy), superior repositioning following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (19 cases, 15 with Le Fort I osteotomy), and total joint replacement (1 case). During follow-up (mean 10 mo), there was no recurrence of osteochondroma. All subjective symptoms were effectively resolved, except 1 patient with mild malocclusion after arthroplasty. Fisher exact test revealed no statistically significant difference in the postoperative symptomatic rate between arthroplasty and BSSRO (P=1.00). In conclusion, individualized treatment plans should be formulated based on imaging findings and the severity of dentomaxillofacial deformity for patients with condylar osteochondroma.

Для цитирования: Chen Shuo, Zou Hengyu, Jie Bimeng, He Yang. Reconstruction Method After Condylar Osteochondroma Resection: A 10-Year Experience.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000013034.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.