MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.008

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2015

Congenital midline cervical cleft: A retrospective case series of 8 children.

Achard Sophie, Leroy Xavier, Fayoux Pierre

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare developmental abnormality of the ventral neck of unclear etiology. It consists of a midline skin defect. This study reports a case series of 8 patients with congenital midline cervical cleft.

METHODS

Retrospective review chart including all children referred with congenital midline cervical cleft over 5 years in tertiary center. The study was conducted to determine the presence of associated malformations, to specify the cleft pathology, to analyze the nature of associated cysts, and to discuss surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Eight patients ranged from 3 days to 5 years. Two had an associated cervical midline cyst, 3 had a significant micrognatia. Pathological observations were in favor of a branchial origin. There was no recurrence of cervical contraction after a mean follow-up of 20 months.

CONCLUSION

Congenital midline cervical cleft is a rare and generally isolated congenital malformation. It does not require either extensive assessment or specific genetic. Described associated cysts might be part of the cleft and not bronchogenic or thyroglossal cysts. Early surgical excision reduces cervical contracture, but linear or Z-plasty closure is still debated.

Для цитирования: Achard Sophie, Leroy Xavier, Fayoux Pierre. Congenital midline cervical cleft: A retrospective case series of 8 children.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.12.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.