Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 1997
Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for the treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schliephake H, Neukam F W, Wichmann M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the long-term results of endosseous implants placed into autogenous bone grafts in severely atrophic alveolar ridges.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 871 implants were placed in 137 patients. The success rate was determined using survival analysis, log rank tests, and a cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-four implant failures were encountered in 23 patients. Most implants were lost because of a lack of osseointegration at the time of abutment connection or by asymptomatic loosening during the first months thereafter. The overall 1-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 83.4%, with a decrease to 67.8% after 5 years. The only parameter of prognostic relevance in the multivariate analysis of the whole study population was the patients' gender, with a significantly worse prognosis in female patients (5-year CSR, 62.3%). However, when the patients were divided into edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, a change was observed in the overall significance of the parameters introduced into the analysis. In edentulous patients, the maxilla appeared to over-rule all other parameters, with a 5-year cumulative survival rate of 48.8%, whereas the mandible presented a significantly higher rate of implant survival (5-year CSR, 89.3%).
CONCLUSION: This study shows a poorer success rate in females than in males, probably because of differences in the quality of the bone grafts.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 871 implants were placed in 137 patients. The success rate was determined using survival analysis, log rank tests, and a cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-four implant failures were encountered in 23 patients. Most implants were lost because of a lack of osseointegration at the time of abutment connection or by asymptomatic loosening during the first months thereafter. The overall 1-year cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 83.4%, with a decrease to 67.8% after 5 years. The only parameter of prognostic relevance in the multivariate analysis of the whole study population was the patients' gender, with a significantly worse prognosis in female patients (5-year CSR, 62.3%). However, when the patients were divided into edentulous and partially edentulous jaws, a change was observed in the overall significance of the parameters introduced into the analysis. In edentulous patients, the maxilla appeared to over-rule all other parameters, with a 5-year cumulative survival rate of 48.8%, whereas the mandible presented a significantly higher rate of implant survival (5-year CSR, 89.3%).
CONCLUSION: This study shows a poorer success rate in females than in males, probably because of differences in the quality of the bone grafts.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAlveolar ProcessAlveolar Ridge AugmentationAlveoloplastyAtrophyBone TransplantationDental AbutmentsDental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsDental Restoration FailureEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansJaw, EdentulousJaw, Edentulous, PartiallyLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMandibleMaxillaMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOsseointegrationPrognosisRegression AnalysisSex FactorsSurvival AnalysisTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome