MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/jscr/rjaf788

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of surgical case reports · 2025

Prophylactic intestinal resection following carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a case report.

Furuyama Takaki, Takiyama Hirotoshi, Kondo Ito, Enjyoji Megumu, Hinokida Makoto, Tatsutomi Yusuke, Nakazawa Kunihiko, Yamada Shigeru, Ushirokoji Yoshio

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) after surgery is often complex and challenging. A 52-year-old man received emergency surgery (Hartmann's procedure) for bowel perforation caused by a huge sigmoid colon cancer, followed by treatment for concurrent advanced lower rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection. A solitary lung metastasis emerged afterwards, and was surgically removed. However, the patient developed LRRC in front of the sacrum. As surgical resection for the local recurrence was considered too invasive, carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) was performed as radical local therapy. Because the surrounding intestine was highly adherent to the tumor and there was a high risk of developing an ulcer, the intestine was prophylactically resected. The patient has remained relapse-free for 2 years and 6 months since the most recent surgery. CIRT for LRRC appears to represent a useful therapeutic option in combination with prophylactic intestinal resection.

Для цитирования: Furuyama Takaki, Takiyama Hirotoshi, Kondo Ito, Enjyoji Megumu, Hinokida Makoto, Tatsutomi Yusuke, Nakazawa Kunihiko, Yamada Shigeru, Ushirokoji Yoshio. Prophylactic intestinal resection following carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer: a case report.. Journal of surgical case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf788.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.