MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The West Virginia medical journal · 2012

Tabletop scenarios for realism in bioterrorism and threat preparedness.

Abraham Rachel T, Walls Richard T, Fischer Mark, Markovic-Reed Sandra, Solovieva Tatiana I, Russell Floyd K, Ducatman Alan M

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Five realistic tabletop scenarios were designed to facilitate threat preparedness training of Medical, Public Health, Nursing, Emergency Services, Mental Health, Allied Health, and Pharmacy personnel. Training scenarios were (1) student contaminates lettuce (Act) in a state university with Shigella sonnei (Agent), (2) dismissed athlete contaminates ice (Act) at the basketball tournament with Escherichia coli (Agent), (3) workers fail to report abandoned backpacks (Act) at a state fair that contain smallpox virus (Agent), (4) terrorists expose county residents (Act) to Pneumonic plague bacterium (Agent), and (5) infected birds expose field-trip participants (Act) to Avian influenza virus (Agent). Evaluation of the tabletops yielded positive ratings of educational outcomes in these domains: well-structured, organized, plausible, realistic, engaging, on-target, useful, and multidisciplinary. Attendees with previous blended-learning courses on bioterrorism and threat preparedness enhanced performance in the tabletop exercises. Evaluative data indicated a new level of competence and self-confidence about being part of a coordinated, local-level, interdisciplinary response.

Для цитирования: Abraham Rachel T, Walls Richard T, Fischer Mark, Markovic-Reed Sandra, Solovieva Tatiana I, Russell Floyd K, Ducatman Alan M. Tabletop scenarios for realism in bioterrorism and threat preparedness.. The West Virginia medical journal. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.