DOI 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002117
Prevalence and clinical significance of arrhythmias during labour in women with structurally normal hearts.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Examine the association between arrhythmias and adverse maternal outcomes in women with structurally normal hearts.
METHODS
This was a case-control study of women admitted in labour to one of eight hospitals of Northwell Health from January 2015 to June 2021. After excluding women with structurally abnormal hearts, we identified women with an arrhythmic event and randomly subsampled the rest of the cohort to create a control group of 1025 patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association between arrhythmias and the incidence of caesarean section (CS), preterm labour (PTL), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and longer length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS
Of 1 41 769 women admitted in labour with a structurally normal heart, 137 had at least one arrhythmic event (0.097%). Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) and frequent premature ventricular complexes or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (VA) were present in 65 (0.046%), 22 (0.016%) and 46 (0.032%) women, respectively. Arrhythmia was previously diagnosed in 58.0% SVT cases but only in 9.7% AF and 8.1% VA cases. After adjusting for age, parity and comorbidities, the presence of any arrhythmia was an independent predictor of CS (OR 1.7 95% CI 1.2 to 2.5), PTL (OR 1.8, CI 1.1 to 3.0) and LOS (mean ratio 1.6, CI 1.4 to 1.8). This association was driven by presence of SVT and AF, whereas VAs were not associated with adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Arrhythmias, specifically SVT and AF, during labour in women with structurally normal heart are independently associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.