Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate pelvic organ prolapse (POP) after a novel abdominal prosthetic surgical technique - 'pelvic organ prolapse suspension' (POPS) - that has been proposed recently as an easily reproducible laparoscopic technique for the treatment of multicompartmental POP and rectal prolapse. This study also aimed to analyse treatment strategies of recurrent POP after POPS, reporting on anatomical, subjective and functional outcomes following recurrence surgery.

METHODS

Patients with a symptomatic prolapse relapse after POPS were collected and analysed prospectively at a single tertiary care institution. Each patient was offered a multidisciplinary clinical and radiological evaluation pre-operatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women with a median age of 59 [interquartile range (IQR) 49-73] years were enrolled in the study. Of these, 88 % were menopausal. All patients had high-grade (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage > 2) recurrent posterior vaginal wall-predominant prolapse after POPS. Multicompartmental prolapse was found in 64 % of patients. All women complained of vaginal bulging associated with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) symptoms. Surgical treatment consisted of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (VR) in all 25 cases (100 %), and concomitant sacral colpopexy (SCP) with previous mesh removal in 16 cases (64 %). No anatomical recurrences were observed after median follow-up of 12 (IQR 3-18) months. Overall subjective improvement after surgery was high in all patients (Patient Global Improvement Index ≤ 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent POP following POPS appears to predominantly involve the posterior vaginal wall, with associated ODS symptoms. A multidisciplinary approach is advisable for treatment of these patients. Minimally invasive VR alone or in combination with SCP seems to represent an effective treatment.