DOI 10.1097/rct.0000000000001475
Postoperative Relapse Prediction in Patients With Ewing Sarcoma Using Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Models Covering Tumor Per Se and Peritumoral Signatures.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model for early relapse prediction in patients with Ewing sarcoma (ES).
METHODS
We recruited 104 patients in this study. Tumor areas and areas with a tumor expansion of 3 mm were used as regions of interest for radiomics analysis. Six different models were constructed: Pre-CT, CT enhancement (CTE), Pre-CT +3 mm , CTE +3 mm , Pre-CT and CTE combined (ComB), and Pre-CT +3 mm and CTE +3 mm combined (ComB +3 mm ). All 3 classifiers used a grid search with 5-fold cross-validation to identify their optimal parameters, followed by repeat 5-fold cross-validation to evaluate the model performance based on these parameters. The average performance of the 5-fold cross-validation and the best one-fold performance of each model were evaluated. The AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) and accuracy were calculated to evaluate the models.
RESULTS
The 6 radiomics models performed well in predicting relapse in patients with ES using the 3 classifiers; the ComB and ComB +3 mm models performed better than the other models (AUC -best : 0.820-0.922/0.823-0.833 and 0.799-0.873/0.759-0.880 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively). Although the Pre-CT +3 mm , CTE +3 mm, and ComB +3 mm models covering tumor per se and peritumoral CT features preoperatively forecasted ES relapse, the model was not significantly improved.
CONCLUSIONS
The radiomics model performed well for early recurrence prediction in patients with ES, and the ComB and ComB +3 mm models may be superior to the other models.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.