MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862960

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1995

Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging and CT with histopathologic correlation.

Becker M, Zbären P, Laeng H, Stoupis C, Porcellini B, Vock P

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of neoplastic invasion of laryngeal cartilage.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In a prospective study, 53 patients with carcinoma of the larynx or piriform sinus underwent CT and MR imaging before total or partial laryngectomy. The findings at imaging and pathologic examination were compared.

RESULTS

At histologic examination, neoplastic invasion of cartilage was present in 34 patients and absent in 19. MR imaging was more sensitive than CT (89% vs 66%; P = .001). Inflammatory changes and fibrosis, however, were indistinguishable from tumor on MR images, resulting in overestimation of neoplastic invasion in a large number of patients. Therefore, MR imaging was less specific than CT (84% vs 94%; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

MR imaging is more sensitive than CT in detecting neoplastic invasion of cartilage, but the inability to differentiate between nonneoplastic inflammatory changes and tumor with MR imaging leads to overestimation of neoplastic invasion.

Для цитирования: Becker M, Zbären P, Laeng H, Stoupis C, Porcellini B, Vock P. Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging and CT with histopathologic correlation.. Radiology. 1995. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862960.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.