Unveiling the best: A comparative analysis of three grafted materials for root coverage - A randomized controlled clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (CTGs) represent the gold standard of treatment for gingival recession; however, the method is associated with some limitations, stemming from necessity of a donor site and the inherent complexity of the harvesting technique. The present study utilizes Mucoderm® (porcine-derived collagen matrix) and amnion membrane (allograft), as a substitute approach for root coverage.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficaciousness of the root coverage outcomes when employing Mucoderm® and amniotic membrane (AM) versus CTG.

MATERIALS AND METHOD: A randomized clinical trial was conducted comparing coronally advanced flap with Mucoderm®, AM and CTG was conducted involving 15 patients subdivided into groups of five. The periodontal pocket depth, clinical attachment level, recession depth, and keratinized tissue width were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed that Mucoderm® showed statistically significant results compared to CTG with regard to clinical parameters and complete coverage, whereas AM showed poorer results in terms of thickness of the gingiva.

CONCLUSION

The study results indicated that Mucoderm® and AM could serve as viable alternatives CTGs in root coverage procedures.