MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/abr.abr_410_21

Медицинская библиотека · Advanced biomedical research · 2023

Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?

Siadat Amirhossein, Galehdari Hamid, Shahmoradi Zabiholah, Iraji Fariba, Zolfaghari Azadeh, Ansari Nazli

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a common parasitic disorder that is endemic in many countries. There is no completely effective treatment for this condition, but pentavalent antimony compounds are regarded as the main treatment. Different laser types have been used for treatment of CL with variable success but to our best knowledge, there is no published paper regarding use of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of CL.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind clinical trial study, we compared the efficacy of intralesional glucantime alone versus intralesional glucantime plus weekly IPL for treatment of 54 patients with confirmed cutaneous leishmaniasis for a maximum of eight weeks as a randomized, clinical trial.

RESULTS

Although it was not statistically significant, combination treatment was more effective than intralesional glucantime alone (P > 0.05). However, the velocity of healing was significantly higher in the IPL plus intralesional glucantime alone versus glucantime alone. No side effect was observed in both groups.

DISCUSSION: To better evaluate the efficacy of IPL, more studies with a higher number of patients and using various IPL filters are recommended.

Для цитирования: Siadat Amirhossein, Galehdari Hamid, Shahmoradi Zabiholah, Iraji Fariba, Zolfaghari Azadeh, Ansari Nazli. Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis with Intense Pulsed Light: Is it Effective?. Advanced biomedical research. 2023. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_410_21.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.