Long-term outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients who receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for purely secondary prevention indications.

AIMS: To assess the rates and predictors of appropriate therapies over a very long-term follow-up period in this population.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and August 2006, 239 consecutive patients with structural left ventricular disease and a secondary prophylaxis indication for ICD therapy (survivors of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias) were prospectively enrolled. An extended follow-up of these patients was carried out. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of appropriate device therapy. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, electrical storm and inappropriate therapy.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 239 patients (90% men; mean age 64±12 years; 72% ischaemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 37±12%). During a median follow-up of 7.8 (3.5-9.3) years, appropriate device therapy occurred in 139 (58.2%) patients. Death occurred in 141 patients (59%), electrical storm in 73 (30.5%) and inappropriate therapy in 42 (17.6%). Multivariable analysis identified patients whose presenting arrhythmia was ventricular fibrillation as being less likely to require appropriate device therapy than those whose presenting arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (sub-hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.97; P=0.04). Independent predictors of all-cause death were age at implantation (P<0.0001), wide QRS complexes (P=0.024), creatinine concentration (P=0.0002) and B-type natriuretic peptide at implantation (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Secondary prevention ICD recipients exhibit a high risk of appropriate device therapy and death over prolonged follow-up. Patients who presented initially with ventricular fibrillation were less likely to require the delivery of appropriate device therapy.