MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3290/j.jad.c_2318

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of adhesive dentistry · 2025

Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion Restorations: Five-Year Follow-Up.

Omoto Érika Mayumi, Pavani Caio César, de Andrade Carvalho Paulo Roberto Marão, Shinohara Mirela Sanae, Perazza Bruna, Fagundes Ticiane Cestari

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Several adhesion strategies have been proposed for restoring non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Long-term clinical trials are essential to guide clinicians toward the most effective approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of NCCLs restored using different adhesion strategies.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Four strategies were assessed: an adhesive system (Scotchbond Universal; SBU/Filtek Z350XT) applied without (SBU) and with selective enamel conditioning (E-SBU), and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer; RMGIC) applied without (RMGIC) and with ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid pretreatment (E-RMGIC). Two hundred restorations were evaluated using United States Public Health Service criteria after 5 years. Kappa test, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, equality tests of two proportions, and multiple logistic regression were applied (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen restorations were re-evaluated after 5 years. No significant differences were observed in restoration survival among groups. E-SBU exhibited more Bravo scores for marginal integrity compared to the ionomer groups and for marginal discoloration compared to RMGIC. Ionomer groups had higher Bravo scores for surface texture. RMGIC showed greater wear than E-SBU, being statistically similar to SBU. No significant differences were found for color and secondary caries over time. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that restoration retention was significantly influenced by the type of tooth (premolars), the degree of dentin sclerosis, and the degree of marginal tissue recession.

CONCLUSIONS

All four adhesion strategies demonstrated similar 5-year survival. Marginal defects were more frequent in the selective enamel etching group than in ionomeric restorations. Surface luster was reduced in ionomer restorations. The retention of NCCL restorations may be affected by tooth type, degree of dentin sclerosis, and marginal tissue recession. The four adhesion strategies had similar survival after 5 years; however, composite resin restorations applied after selective enamel etching promote more initial marginal defects than ionomer-based restorations following the manufacturer's instructions. Clinical factors such as lesion location, dentin sclerosis, and gingival recession can influence the retention of NCCL restorations.

Для цитирования: Omoto Érika Mayumi, Pavani Caio César, de Andrade Carvalho Paulo Roberto Marão, Shinohara Mirela Sanae, Perazza Bruna, Fagundes Ticiane Cestari. Randomized Clinical Trial of Four Adhesion Strategies in Non-Carious Cervical Lesion Restorations: Five-Year Follow-Up.. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2025. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.c_2318.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.