MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00423-024-03262-7

Медицинская библиотека · Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024

Mental health disorders as a risk factor in young patients with rectal prolapse.

Whitlock Ashlyn E, Arndt Kevin R, Allar Benjamin G, Fakler Michelle N, Cataldo Thomas E, Crowell Kristen T, Fabrizio Anne C, Messaris Evangelos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Rectal prolapse (RP) typically presents in the elderly, though it can present in younger patients lacking traditional risk factors. The current study compares medical and mental health history, presentation, and outcomes for young and older patients with RP.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent abdominal repair of RP between 2005 and 2019. Individuals were dichotomized into two groups based on age greater or less than 40 years.

RESULTS

Of 156 patients, 25 were < 40. Younger patients had higher rates of diagnosed mental health disorders (80% vs 41%, p < 0.001), more likely to take SSRIs (p = .02), SNRIs (p = .021), anxiolytics (p = 0.033), and antipsychotics (p < 0.001). Younger patients had lower preoperative incontinence but higher constipation. Both groups had low rates of recurrence (9.1% vs 11.6%, p = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients with RP present with higher concomitant mental health diagnoses and represent unique risk factors characterized by chronic straining compared to pelvic floor laxity.

Для цитирования: Whitlock Ashlyn E, Arndt Kevin R, Allar Benjamin G, Fakler Michelle N, Cataldo Thomas E, Crowell Kristen T, Fabrizio Anne C, Messaris Evangelos. Mental health disorders as a risk factor in young patients with rectal prolapse.. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03262-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.