Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2016
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sweis Randy F, Medved Milica, Towey Shannon, Karczmar Gregory S, Oto Aytekin, Szmulewitz Russell Z, O'Donnell Peter H, Fishkin Paul, Karrison Theodore, Stadler Walter M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Traditional imaging assessment criteria might not correlate well with clinical benefit from vascular endothelial growth factor pathway-directed therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Preclinical data suggest tumor growth is preceded by a rise in Ktrans level, a parameter derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that reflects vascular permeability. We thus hypothesized that Ktrans might be a predictive biomarker for pazopanib.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cancer were treated with pazopanib at 800 mg oral daily until disease progression. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with a DCE-MRI sequence was obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks.
RESULTS: Seventy-three DCE-MRI scans were completed and 66 were technically assessable. Of the 17 patients with at least 1 DCE-MRI scan after the baseline scan, 16 (94%) had a decline in Ktrans level. Changes in Ktrans compared with baseline after 1, 8, 16, and 24 weeks were -49%, -65%, -63%, and -53%, respectively (P = .0052, repeated measures analysis of variance). The median Ktrans nadir occurred at 8 weeks. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.1 weeks. PFS was longer in patients with higher baseline Ktrans values (P = .036, log rank). Baseline Ktrans did not reach significance in a Cox proportional hazard model including clinical prognostic index and previous treatments (P = .083).
CONCLUSION: We show that Ktrans is a pharmacodynamic biomarker for pazopanib therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Because of the small sample size, the predictive capacity of Ktrans recovery could not be assessed, but baseline Ktrans correlated with PFS.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cancer were treated with pazopanib at 800 mg oral daily until disease progression. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with a DCE-MRI sequence was obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks.
RESULTS: Seventy-three DCE-MRI scans were completed and 66 were technically assessable. Of the 17 patients with at least 1 DCE-MRI scan after the baseline scan, 16 (94%) had a decline in Ktrans level. Changes in Ktrans compared with baseline after 1, 8, 16, and 24 weeks were -49%, -65%, -63%, and -53%, respectively (P = .0052, repeated measures analysis of variance). The median Ktrans nadir occurred at 8 weeks. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.1 weeks. PFS was longer in patients with higher baseline Ktrans values (P = .036, log rank). Baseline Ktrans did not reach significance in a Cox proportional hazard model including clinical prognostic index and previous treatments (P = .083).
CONCLUSION: We show that Ktrans is a pharmacodynamic biomarker for pazopanib therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Because of the small sample size, the predictive capacity of Ktrans recovery could not be assessed, but baseline Ktrans correlated with PFS.