DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124425
Occipital Monitoring of Patient State Index During Frontal Tumor Resection: A Feasibility Study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Frontal patient state index (PSI) monitoring is impractical during frontal lobe tumor resection due to surgical field interference. No validated alternative monitoring positions exist currently. This study evaluated the agreement between standard frontal and experimental occipital PSI monitoring.
METHODS
A SedLine sedation monitor was used to record frontal and occipital PSI values in 16 patients who underwent frontal lobe tumor resection. PSI data were collected at 2-second intervals starting from sensor attachment to headframe fixation. Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient. Subgroup analyses evaluated tumor laterality. A Passing-Bablok regression established predictive equations between frontal and occipital PSI at 7 critical time points.
RESULTS
Frontal and occipital PSI trends showed high temporal synchrony (P = 0.08) with a strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.805, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated excellent agreement (mean log-transformed difference: -0.02; 95% limits of agreement: -0.82 to 0.80). The intraclass correlation coefficient of all data was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.816-0.830, P < 0.001). Tumor laterality did not significantly affect frontal-occipital PSI differences (P = 0.382). A Passing-Bablok regression equation was derived to predict frontal PSI from occipital measurements: ePSI=0.37×(zPSI)1.28.
CONCLUSIONS
Occipital PSI demonstrates excellent agreement with frontal PSI during frontal tumor resection, offering a viable alternative to obstructed frontal monitoring. Prospective validation via multi-center continuous intraoperative monitoring constitutes the essential next step.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.