DOI 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2026.102711
MRI-based deep learning model predicts recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The pretreatment identification of post-radiation nasopharyngeal necrosis (PRNN) combined with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (referred to as cancer-infiltrative PRNN) is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of PRNN. As the first study to identify recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients with PRNN, we aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based predictive model using routine MRI to distinguish cancer-infiltrative PRNN from cancer-free PRNN.
METHODS
MRIs of 437 patients with PRNN were manually labeled and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Video Swin Transformer and Multilayer Perceptron were employed to construct the DL model. The integrated DL and clinical model (DCcombined model) and the integrated radiomics and clinical model (RCcombined model) were constructed using linear weighted fusion of the prediction results from the two models. The predictive value of each model was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
RESULTS
The DCcombined model significantly outperformed the radiologists in terms of AUC (0.83 vs. 0.60, p < 0.001), accuracy (0.78 vs. 0.60, p = 0.002), and sensitivity (0.86 vs. 0.62, p = 0.002) in the validation cohort. The DCcombined model showed the highest validation sensitivity of 0.86 (95 % CI 0.77-0.94), whereas the RCcombined model demonstrated the highest specificity of 0.88 (95 % CI 0.81-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS
Our DCcombined model based on DL can noninvasively distinguish cancer-infiltrative PRNN from cancer-free PRNN with higher AUC, accuracy, and sensitivity than those of radiologists and better sensitivity than that of the RCcombined model based on radiomics.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.