MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2026.07.035

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of surgical research · 2026

Referral Patterns and Outcomes Following Incidental Computed Tomography Reporting of Fat-Containing Inguinal Hernias.

Huselid Rachel, Soonthornprapuet Patrick, Oconnor Mario, Manuel David L, Kristo Gentian

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernia repair is common, with most diagnoses made clinically. However, incidental "inguinal hernia" findings on computed tomography (CT) scans performed for unrelated reasons may prompt surgical referral. This study evaluated referral patterns and surgical outcomes following incidental CT diagnoses in radiology reports.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review (2015-2025) of patients at our institution with "fat-containing inguinal hernia" reported on CT abdomen/pelvis obtained for nonhernia indications. We assessed referral rates, clinical findings, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1145 patients, 47 (4.1%) were referred to for surgical evaluation. Of these patients, 19 (40.4%) had a hernia on exam, and 17 (36.2%) were recommended for repair. Ultimately, 12 patients (1% overall; 25.5% of referrals) underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Most incidental CT report wording of inguinal hernias do not lead to referral or surgery and clinical correlation is important. Primary care evaluations may help identify patients who warrant surgical consultation while reducing unnecessary referrals.

Для цитирования: Huselid Rachel, Soonthornprapuet Patrick, Oconnor Mario, Manuel David L, Kristo Gentian. Referral Patterns and Outcomes Following Incidental Computed Tomography Reporting of Fat-Containing Inguinal Hernias.. The Journal of surgical research. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2026.07.035.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.