European journal of endocrinology · 2025
Redefining hemodynamic instability in pheochromocytoma surgery through latent class analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alberici Laura, Ricci Claudio, Vicennati Valentina, Windle Isabella Sophia Lucy, Ingaldi Carlo, Fichera Marco, Selva Saverio, Cosentino Eugenio, De Leo Antonio, Balacchi Caterina, Nanni Cristina, D'Andrea Rocco, Casadei Riccardo, Di Dalmazi Guido
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic instability (HDI) during pheochromocytoma surgical resection remains a major anesthesiologic challenge. The definition of HDI is often arbitrary, limiting comparability and risk stratification. We aimed to develop an objective, data-driven classification of intraoperative HDI.
METHODS: Hemodynamic variables, including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were collected at 5 intraoperative time points. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify patients into 2 groups: low-risk (l-HDI) and high-risk (h-HDI) HDI classes. We compared 4 LCA models based on different combinations of variables (SBP + DBP, SBP + DBP + HR, MAP, MAP + HR) to identify the optimal classification of HDI, using AIC and BIC for model selection.
RESULTS: Among 92 patients, the LCA model based solely on intraoperative MAP yielded the best classification of HDI (AIC: 3783; BIC: 3824). Two latent classes were identified: high-risk HDI (n = 32, 34.8%) and low-risk HDI (n = 60, 65.2%). MAP values were significantly different between the 2 groups during anesthesia induction (89 vs 102 mmHg, P < .001), pneumoperitoneum induction (83 vs 94 mmHg, P = .002), gland manipulation (95 vs 131 mmHg, P < .001), and immediately post-adrenal vein ligation (79 vs 83 mmHg, P = .039). Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients' age (OR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P = .047) and symptomatic presentation (OR 15.35; 95% CI 4.19-56.2; P < .001) were strongly associated with HDI.
CONCLUSION: This study proposes a reproducible and objective classification of intraoperative HDI in pheochromocytoma surgery based on MAP-derived LCA.
METHODS: Hemodynamic variables, including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were collected at 5 intraoperative time points. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to classify patients into 2 groups: low-risk (l-HDI) and high-risk (h-HDI) HDI classes. We compared 4 LCA models based on different combinations of variables (SBP + DBP, SBP + DBP + HR, MAP, MAP + HR) to identify the optimal classification of HDI, using AIC and BIC for model selection.
RESULTS: Among 92 patients, the LCA model based solely on intraoperative MAP yielded the best classification of HDI (AIC: 3783; BIC: 3824). Two latent classes were identified: high-risk HDI (n = 32, 34.8%) and low-risk HDI (n = 60, 65.2%). MAP values were significantly different between the 2 groups during anesthesia induction (89 vs 102 mmHg, P < .001), pneumoperitoneum induction (83 vs 94 mmHg, P = .002), gland manipulation (95 vs 131 mmHg, P < .001), and immediately post-adrenal vein ligation (79 vs 83 mmHg, P = .039). Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients' age (OR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.01-1.02; P = .047) and symptomatic presentation (OR 15.35; 95% CI 4.19-56.2; P < .001) were strongly associated with HDI.
CONCLUSION: This study proposes a reproducible and objective classification of intraoperative HDI in pheochromocytoma surgery based on MAP-derived LCA.