MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jemr19050095

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of eye movement research · 2026

Lexical Context Effects During Reading: The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge and Word Frequency.

Abraham Ashley N, Folk Jocelyn R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Skilled readers are thought to rely on bottom-up processing to activate word meanings in long-term memory from their form (i.e., spelling or sound) in a process described as 'context-free' lexical processing. However, other research suggests skilled readers recognize words faster when they appear in predictable and/or plausible contexts, despite efficient bottom-up processing. Research on individual differences in skilled comprehension suggests skilled readers only use context to support word recognition when bottom-up processing is slow. Therefore, highly skilled readers may not rely on context, but less-skilled readers may continue to rely on context during word recognition due to poor bottom-up processing. The current study investigated whether individual differences in lexical quality would influence contextual processing during word recognition. Participants' eye movements were tracked as they read sentences containing either a high-frequency (e.g., baby) or low-frequency (e.g., elbow) target word preceded by either a related prime word (mother-baby) or an unrelated control word (teeth-elbow). Results show relatedness had a significant effect on readers across the range of lexical knowledge; however, the specific effect depended on both vocabulary and target word frequency. The results suggest that context supports word recognition and comprehension when readers have adequate vocabulary.

Для цитирования: Abraham Ashley N, Folk Jocelyn R. Lexical Context Effects During Reading: The Impact of Vocabulary Knowledge and Word Frequency.. Journal of eye movement research. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jemr19050095.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.