MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/moo.0000000000000070

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2014

Masseteric nerve use in facial reanimation.

Henstrom Douglas K

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the growing literature on the use of the masseteric nerve in facial reanimation, from direct neurotization, to 'baby-sitter' techniques, to its use in powering neuromuscular free tissue transfer. We focus on the indications for the different uses based on the timing of the facial paralysis and other patient factors.

RECENT FINDINGS: The use of the masseteric nerve in facial reanimation is gaining widespread acceptance for use in an expanding number of clinical scenarios. Surgeon's experience and preference as well as patient selection are very important factors in choosing the appropriate surgical use of this nerve.

SUMMARY: Facial reanimation surgery is a difficult challenge for any reconstructive surgeon. The use of the masseteric nerve branch to reanimate the face is gaining popularity. Its versatility, anatomical location, relative ease of dissection, low morbidity, and high potential for motor neural input make it an excellent option for many different reanimating techniques. The appropriate nerve use should be based on the type of facial paralysis, its timing, and patient factors such as age, prognosis, and desires. Understanding the benefits and potential drawbacks of utilizing this nerve represents an essential piece of knowledge for the facial reanimation surgeon.

Для цитирования: Henstrom Douglas K. Masseteric nerve use in facial reanimation.. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000070.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.